Garrigues

ELIGE TU PAÍS / ESCOLHA O SEU PAÍS / CHOOSE YOUR COUNTRY / WYBIERZ SWÓJ KRAJ / 选择您的国家

Pillar 2 in Spain: Global Minimum Tax for large groups approved

Pillar 2 in Spain: Global Minimum Tax for large groups approved

Spain - 

We review its main characteristics and remind you of the aspects to which you should pay special attention.

On 21 December 2024, Law 7/2024 of 20 December was published in the Official State Gazette (BOE), which, among others, transposes Council Directive (EU) 2022/2523 in Spain, which aims to ensure an overall minimum level of taxation for multinational groups and large-scale domestic groups (Pillar 2). Specifically, the law incorporates a complementary tax (so called “Top-up-Tax, "TUT"), applicable to large groups with an annual consolidated revenue of EUR 750 million or more in at least two of the four fiscal years prior to the reference year, so that a minimum taxation threshold of 15% is reached in all cases. This tax will apply to large groups with a presence in Spain.

In general, the new tax will be effective for tax periods beginning on or after 1 January 2024, although certain deferred application rules are provided for and will be summarised below.

In this document we analyse the main keys to the new regulation.

In addition, in this other publication we analyse other tax measures included in Law 7/2024, and here the novelties related to the Economic and Fiscal Regime of the Canary Islands.

 

 

The Supreme Court declares that it is not possible to increase compensation for unfair dismissal through the courts

The Supreme Court declares that it is not possible to increase compensation for unfair dismissal through the courts

Spain - 

It considers that article 56 of the Workers' Statute does not violate the provisions of article 10 of Convention No. 158 of the International Labor Organisation, the two provisions being compatible.

As reported on the website of the Judiciary, the Plenary of the Supreme Court has ruled that it is not appropriate to pay additional compensation to that already provided for in our legislation for unjustified dismissals.

Among other reasons, it is based on the fact that (i) the doctrine of the Constitutional Court considers it to be adequate compensation, (ii) the labour law is different from the civil regulation, (iii) Convention No. 158 uses generic concepts that prevent its direct application to each case and (iv) article 12 of the ILO Convention itself refers to salary and seniority when it establishes parameters for calculating compensation for contractual termination. It also states that the legal formula has been offering legal certainty and uniformity for all workers who are compensated on the same terms.

The judgment points out that, due to the date on which the dismissal under examination took place, it cannot consider the scope of Article 24 of the European Social Charter (revised), which was published in the Official State Gazette of 11 June 2021. The judgment, however, has not yet been published.

 

 

Portugal: Minimum monthly wage increases in 2025

Portugal: Minimum monthly wage increases in 2025

Portugal - 

Decree-Law no. 112/2024, of December 19th was publish on Portugal’s Official Gazette, ruling the minimum monthly wage’s increase to 870 euros, with effects from January 1st, 2025, onwards.

The minimum monthly wage established by law prevails over any inferior wages set forth in employment contracts or in Collective Bargaining Agreements.

Therefore, from January 1st, 2025, onwards, any employee that is currently receiving a wage inferior to 870 euros will be entitled to have the wage increased to, at least, that amount.

In case of part-time employees, the minimum monthly wage is calculated proportionally.

The minimum monthly wage in the autonomous regions of Madeira and Azores is subject to specific ruling.

 

Portugal Indirect Taxes Newsletter - N.º 2

Portugal Indirect Taxes Newsletter - N.º 2

Portugal - 

This edition covers key indirect tax developments in Portugal in the last months, especially regarding the postponing, from 2024 to 2025, of the extraordinary use of PDF invoices as electronic invoices and the Stamp Duty framework of financial operations carried out between branches and their headquarters.

News

  • PDF invoices ending and accounting SAF-T file only in 2026
  • The VAT Directive expands the reduced VAT rate to certain products

Portuguese Tax Authority standpoints

  • VAT regularization on unfinished construction projects
  • Reinterpretation of the out-of-scope rule under the transfer of an exempt VAT business

Trends

  • Uncertainties on the Stamp Duty framework on financial operations between branches and their headquarters
  • Late registration and consequent limitation to VAT deduction

Check the full newsletter here.

 

Garrigues wins two IJInvestor Awards (Americas) for its advice on projects in Chile and Peru

Garrigues wins two IJInvestor Awards (Americas) for its advice on projects in Chile and Peru

Latinoamérica - 

Both projects have already garnered recognition from LatinFinance

Garrigues has been recognized in the Transaction Awards category in the latest edition of the IJInvestor Awards (Americas) for its advice on two major transactions in Chile and Peru.

Specifically, Garrigues picked up Refinance of the Year in Latin America for its involvement in the acquisition and refinancing of EnfraGen renewable energy assets in Chile. It also took Utilities Acquisition of the Year in Latin America for the acquisition of Enel’s Peruvian renewable energy assets by Actis.

Both projects were also winners at the LatinFinance Project and Infrastructure Finance Awards, organized by financial publication LatinFinance in October.

In the first case, Garrigues’ four Latin American offices advised the lenders on the modification of a US$1.04 billion credit facility granted to Prime Energía SpA, Enfragen Spain SAU and Enfragen Energía Sur SAU (subsidiaries of the Enfragen group). The credit facility, closed in October 2023, was used to acquire and develop multiple power plants in various jurisdictions, including Colombia, Costa Rica, Panama and Spain.

In the second case, the firm advised investment fund Actis on the acquisition of 92.35% of the voting shares of Orygen Peru (formerly Enel Generación Peru). The deal, valued at a total of US$1.3 billion, set the record for the largest ever tender offer registered on the Lima stock exchange. Several Garrigues teams took part in the deal: M&A, Antitrust, Financial Regulation/Capital Markets and Finance.

The IJInvestor Awards feature 28 categories across three divisions: Company Awards, Transaction Awards and Individual Awards. Their aim is to acknowledge excellence in fund raising and deployment, as well as M&A activity in the energy and infrastructure sector.

 

Judicial sale of a mortgaged property with a rural lease after the mortgage does not cause the lease to lapse

Judicial sale of a mortgaged property with a rural lease after the mortgage does not cause the lease to lapse

Portugal - 

The Portuguese Supreme Court of Justice (SCJ) has delivered a Decision uniformizing case law (SCJ Decision no. 14/2024, of 12.12) with the following content: "The sale of a mortgaged property, with a rural lease entered into after the mortgage, does not cause this lease to lapse in accordance with article 22.º § 1 of the Rural Lease Legislation, rendering article 824.º § 2 of the Civil Code inapplicable". 

As this is a decision with a clear economic and social relevance and an impact on markets such as mortgage credit or Non-Performing Loan (NPL) portfolio transactions, it is important to know and take into account its meaning and terms.   

This Decision was published on 12 December 2024 in the Portuguese State Gazette - Diário da República, 1ª série - and this Alert sets out the most relevant points of the grounds for this decision.

Issue to be resolve by the SCJ

To know whether, in the context of common enforcement proceedings, the judicial sale of a mortgaged and leased property, under a rural lease contract entered into after the mortgage, results in the termination of the lease, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 824 of the Civil Code (“CC”) or whether, on the contrary, such termination does not occur under the provisions of paragraph 1 of article 22 of the Rural Lease Legislation (RAR - Decree-Law no. 385/88, of 25 October, as amended by Decree-Law no. 524/99, of 10 December).   

The SCJ's uniformizing decision was negative. 

Main arguments presented by the SCJ

  • Obligational nature of the lease contract (rural);
  • The list of cases in which the lease contract expires (art. 1051 of the CC) does not include the judicial sale;
  • In paragraph 1 of Article 22 of the RAR, the legislator, being aware of the doctrinal and jurisprudential controversy surrounding the application of paragraph 2 of Article 824 of the CC, expressly stated (and in a more emphatic manner than Article 1057 of the CC) that the lease does not terminate upon the transfer of the property;
  • It cannot currently be asserted that a lease has the same aptitude as rights in rem to jeopardize the enforcement sale of the property for the best price, as it is a personal right of enjoyment (direito pessoal de gozo) and no longer possesses the characteristics of a potentially unlimited right;
  • The most recent rural lease laws have emphasised the social and economic importance of this right;
  • Although there may be cases of fraudulent behaviour on the part of real estate owners who, by leasing their mortgaged property, are defrauding the mortgage creditor of its expectations, the non-expiry of the lease does not leave mortgage creditors totally unprotected, as they may resort to the following instruments:
    • Request the substitution or strengthening of the mortgage, under penalty of demanding the immediate fulfilment of the obligation or, in the case of a future obligation, the registration of a mortgage on other assets of the debtor;
    • Resort to an actio pauliana against the debtor who encumbers the mortgaged property, provided the legal requirements are met;
    • Preventively establish a contractual clause that the mortgage debt becomes due immediately if the mortgaged property is encumbered with a lease.

Comments

  • This SCJ decision is unsurprising, considering the recent uniformizing case law issued by the SCJ in its Decision No. 2/2021, dated 5 August, albeit in relation to residential leases and judicial sales in insolvency proceedings.
  • This SCJ decision heavily relies on the arguments supporting the (controversial) prevailing thesis adopted in Decision No. 2/2021, particularly the prioritization of tenants' interests over those of mortgage creditors.
  • Despite the SCJ’s effort to argue that mortgage creditors are not left entirely unprotected, the mechanisms it identifies are, as the SCJ itself acknowledges, weak.
  • This decision, following the case law set by Decision No. 2/2021, further underscores the loss of security and legal robustness of mortgages as a creditor's guarantee.
  • In our previous publication regarding Decision No. 2/2021, we alerted to the potential extension of this jurisprudence to judicial sales carried out in the context of enforcement proceedings, which has now been confirmed.
  • Finally, as with Decision No. 2/2021, the prevailing thesis in this case is far from achieving a consensus among the Judges of the SCJ (17 votes in favour versus 11 against).

The EU sets out the basis for ESG ratings in finance

The EU sets out the basis for ESG ratings in finance

European Union - 

A new regulation introduces the requirements to be met by ESG rating providers as well as the regulated financial undertakings using them and seeks to enhance their reliability and comparability.

With the aim of setting out a common legislative framework for enhancing the transparency, integrity and quality of environmental, social and governance (ESG)  ratings, on November 6 the European Union adopted the  Regulation on the transparency and integrity of Environmental, Social and Governance rating activities. Facilitating sustainable finance alongside protecting consumers and investors are at the core of this new regulation, which is in alignment with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the European Green Deal.

Improving the transparency and quality levels in ESG ratings are between the objectives pursued by this new regulation, in addition to guaranteeing  the integrity and comparability between them. Another priority is to protect consumers and investors from greenwashing and misinformation. Lastly, it also seeks to promote sustainable finance and channel capital flows towards sustainable investments.

To achieve its aim, the regulation imposes obligations on all ESG rating providers operating in the European Union. For the purposes of this regulation, this classification applies, among other entities, to providers issuing and publishing ratings on their websites or distributing them to regulated EU financial undertakings. The obligations to be taken into consideration by ESG rating providers are the following:

  • Obtaining an authorization from the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to be able to operate in the European Union. Additionally, there is a temporary regime with reduced requirements that can benefit small providers before they obtain complete authorization.
  • Disclosing on their websites and through the European Single Access Point (ESAP) the methodologies, models and key rating assumptions used by them.
  • Providing detailed information on data sources, data processes and any use of artificial intelligence in both data collection and rating processes.
  • Ensuring the independence of their rating activities and avoiding inappropriate influences.
  • Implementing policies and procedures to identify, manage and mitigate conflicts of interest.
  • Not offering consulting services, credit ratings, benchmarks, investment or audit services, or banking or insurance activities.
  • Establishing an organizational structure with clear roles and responsibilities.
  • Implementing internal control mechanisms and administrative procedures.
  • Maintaining a permanent, independent and effective oversight function to ensure the issuance of the provision of their ESG ratings
  • Notifying the rated item or the issuer before the first issuance of the ESG rating to give the opportunity to correct any factual errors.
  • Providing access to the data used for the rating, thereby enabling the information to be verified.

ESMA will have the power to supervise the activities of ESG rating providers. In the event of infringement of the regulation’s obligations, it can impose sanctions, including fines and periodic penalty payments. It will also be able to suspend or withdraw authorizations for providers who do not abide by the stipulated requirements.

Any regulated financial undertakings that use ESG ratings in their products or services must ensure that they fulfill the regulation's requirements. Moreover, where they refer to ESG ratings in their marketing communications they must disclose the same information as rating providers.

The competent authorities will be in charge of supervising financial undertakings’ compliance with the regulation. To make this possible, financial undertakings are obliged to cooperate with the authorities and provide the necessary information for their supervision.

In short, the regulation on ESG ratings in the EU provides a strong legal framework for ensuring the quality, transparency and integrity of this type of ratings, and by doing so paves the way for sustainable finance as well as for protecting consumers and investors.